Performance analysis of covariance. See ancova()
for full details.
Usage
ancova_single(
data,
outcome,
group,
covariates,
weights = c("counterfactual", "equal", "proportional_em", "proportional")
)
Arguments
- data
A
data.frame
containing the data to be used in the model.- outcome
Character, the name of the outcome variable in
data
.- group
Character, the name of the group variable in
data
.- covariates
Character vector containing the name of any additional covariates to be included in the model as well as any interaction terms.
- weights
Character, either
"counterfactual"
(default),"equal"
,"proportional_em"
or"proportional"
. Specifies the weighting strategy to be used when calculating the lsmeans. See the weighting section for more details.
Details
group
must be a factor variable with only 2 levels.outcome
must be a continuous numeric variable.
Weighting
Counterfactual
For weights = "counterfactual"
(the default) the lsmeans are obtained by
taking the average of the predicted values for each patient after assigning all patients
to each arm in turn.
This approach is equivalent to standardization or g-computation.
In comparison to emmeans
this approach is equivalent to:
Note that to ensure backwards compatibility with previous versions of rbmi
weights = "proportional"
is an alias for weights = "counterfactual"
.
To get results consistent with emmeans
's weights = "proportional"
please use weights = "proportional_em"
.
Equal
For weights = "equal"
the lsmeans are obtained by taking the model fitted
value of a hypothetical patient whose covariates are defined as follows:
Continuous covariates are set to
mean(X)
Dummy categorical variables are set to
1/N
whereN
is the number of levelsContinuous * continuous interactions are set to
mean(X) * mean(Y)
Continuous * categorical interactions are set to
mean(X) * 1/N
Dummy categorical * categorical interactions are set to
1/N * 1/M
In comparison to emmeans
this approach is equivalent to:
Proportional
For weights = "proportional_em"
the lsmeans are obtained as per weights = "equal"
except instead of weighting each observation equally they are weighted by the proportion
in which the given combination of categorical values occurred in the data.
In comparison to emmeans
this approach is equivalent to:
Note that this is not to be confused with weights = "proportional"
which is an alias
for weights = "counterfactual"
.